In this fourth post of the series we cover the most critical and painful step taken by all the market leaders in our research - getting the right team in place.
Every company that made a breakthrough in performance ascribed it to making significant changes to the team, at the top level and at the level below it. This did not necessarily mean wholesale changes, and all companies emphasised the importance of retaining experience, but it did mean changes in important management positions.
A typical story involved losing one or two senior people who were strong, talented individuals who nevertheless caused problems in the team. For smaller companies this was often the original entrepreneurs, for bigger organisations it was senior directors and managers.
In many circumstances CEOs perceived a high level of risk in losing an individual, such as the fact that they were high performers or that losing them might mean losing other people that respected them or worked for them.
However, although the decision was always a tough one, it was invariably seen as an obvious one. In fact the biggest regret that successful companies had was not making changes to the team more quickly.
And this is not wisdom in retrospect. Everyone we spoke to who made changes to the team said that at the time they knew what they should do but delayed taking the painful step.
In contrast to some established theories we did not see a clear pattern of “first who, then what”. The new team did make changes but never to the cause. All of the companies who made a breakthrough had the same basic and underlying cause before and after the team was in place. The changes that came with the new team were primarily in the culture and capability of the business. Changes to the product or service on offer were about focusing and refinement rather than fundamental redirection.
Finally, the right team did not always mean a completely balanced team. We saw a clear pattern among the leaders of skewing attitudes and skills of senior people towards what was distinctive about each company. For example, one successful software business deliberately skewed its team towards developers and away from marketers. And in many cases it was deliberately left to the support people to supply the capabilities to balance their leaders’ skill gaps and deficiencies. The common and essential precondition for the team was its alignment to the cause.
In our next post, the other major action market leaders took to make a performance breakthrough - creation of breathing space.
Copyright Latitude 2009. All rights reserved.
Latitude Partners Ltd
19 Bulstrode Street, London W1U 2JN
www.latitude.co.uk
For the full text of this series email steve@latitude.co.uk
A Minute with Alan® — Expunging Guilt
16 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment